Panel of Experts Decries Scientific Inaccuracies in "Alien versus Predator", "Riddick Chronicles"

The panel "Science for Obvious Conclusions in the Public Interest" released a report today detailing what it described as "severe scientific fallacies" in several motion pictures. They were especially critical of recent science fiction films. As one panel member stated " there are going to be people going to these movies who think they are documentaries. But, damn it, they're not! When will hollywood learn the dangers of putting fictional and poorly researched plots on the movie screen?"
The report details, with dismaying accuracy, the poor physics employed by the movie "Chronicles of Riddick" when describing space travel. "Not to mention," panel chairman Dr. Mark Schroeder pointed out, "that whole dimension of the dead thing. Underverse? What the hell is that? Nobody covered that crap in my astrophysics classes! I'm starting to think it's just something some guy made up!"
This is not the first time this panel of experts has made headlines. After the release of the movie "Matrix" the panel produced a comprehensive report proving irrefutably that most of the martial arts manuevers in the film were completely impossible. A report they claim was ignored.
In their current press release they point out problems with both the physics and the anthropological conclusions in "Alien versus Predator"; plot problems they insist must not be ignored. "For God's sake," Schroeder insisted," children are learning their science from these films! Do we want them to grow up and sacrifice us to alien overlords?"